前往 Is "NameVirtualHost" necessary? - Server F
發布時間: 2021-09-27推薦指數: 3.010人已投票
您即將離開本站,並前往Is "NameVirtualHost" necessary? - Server Fault
確認離開返回上頁請問您是否推薦這篇文章?
VirtualHost ApacheNameVirtualHost has no effect and will be removed in the next releaseApache virtual host portNameVirtualHostwindows apache ssl設定VirtualHost *:443apache virtual host設定Apache 2.2 namevirtualhostvirtualhost 443Apache Virtual Hostnamevirtualhost :443NameVirtualHost *:80 has no VirtualHosts
相關文章資訊
- 1VirtualHost Examples - Apache HTTP Server
Server configuration. # Ensure that Apache listens on port 80. Listen 80 # Listen for virtual hos...
- 2Is "NameVirtualHost" necessary? - Server Fault
Ok, it really seems to be not necessary anymore: Nov 10 13:55:05 hostname apache2[1718]: Starting...
- 3Apache Virtual Host 多網域網站放置在同一台主機上@ 黃昏的 ...
底下例子以上面綠底圖範例作說明www.n.com 為第一個網站,a.n.com 為第二個增加的網站. NameVirtualHost *:80 <VirtualHost *:80> ...
- 480-不支持將*端口和非*端口與NameVirtualHost地址混合,進行 ...
錯誤:“ VirtualHost *:80-不支持將*端口和非*端口與NameVirtualHost地址混合,進行未定義的結果” (Error: "VirtualHost *:80 -- mix...
- 5warn NameVirtualHost *:443 has no VirtualHosts - Stack ...
Simply Put: Apache is listening on 443 but there are no VirtualHosts (websites) defined on that p...
- 6An Apache name based virtual host (NameVirtualHost) tutorial
An Apache name-based virtual host (NameVirtualHost) tutorial: As a quick reminder to myself for s...